Supreme Court of the United States Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 words

coercive Court of the United States - Assignment Example?s expression is consistent with narrowly tailored use to achieve diversity and other factor to qualification are equally significant to the applicants selection process. Consequently, the use of race is not an isolated factor to selection and this undermines favoritism of applicants from minority races. The wooing of Grantz, however, fails to identify the narrowly tailored application and instead offers advantage to applicants from minority races. This is because the university offers superfluous 20 percent points to applicants from minority races, a factor that makes race an isolated and significant factor to qualification. The narrowly tailored concept therefore establishes constitutionality of the universitys provisions under the Grutter case but unconstitutionality under the Grantz case (Supreme Court of the United States 4 Supreme Court of the United States1 31). lee(prenominal) Bolinger was sued in both cases becaus e he is an agent to the artificial person and therefore acts on behalf of the institution. He is therefore not sued on his individual(prenominal) capacity but on capacities of the positions that he held at the times that interests on the case arose. In the Grutter case, for example, he is sued in the capacity of the Dean of the Law School and the capacity of the Universitys president while in the case of Grants, he is sued in his capacity as the Universitys president.Supreme Court of the United States. Jennifer Grantz and Patrick Hamacher, petitioners v. Lee Bollinger et al., No. 02-516. Supreme Court of the United States. N.d. Web. February 17, 2015. .Supreme Court of the United States1. Barbara Grutter, petitioner v. Lee Bbollinger et al. Supreme Court of the United States. N.d. Web. February 17, 2015.